Coherence is fundamental in politics, as it implies the connection between thought and transformative action. Machiavelli suggested that under certain circumstances, a ruler can justify a distance between ethical ideals and real political decisions in the name of the stability and survival of the principality. In this sense, coherence implies a more intellectual and rational approach than emotional, where knowledge and critical thinking must be directed towards transformation.
In Spain, a case of incongruity has arisen due to incoherent behavior by the spokesperson of Sumar, a left-wing political force linked to the PSOE in government. This lack of coherence is associated with personal integrity, where interpersonal and group loyalty, conceptual coherence, and intrapersonal congruence are fundamental in politics.
In the political sphere, parties like the PAN have based their cohesion on doctrinal strength, while others like Morena have generated dilemmas between loyalty and capability. Ethics in politics is divided into ethics of conviction, based on principles and values, and ethics of responsibility, focused on the practical consequences of actions.
The scandal of disloyalty to feminist causes in a governmental party exposed the lack of coherence and congruence of a politician, which jeopardized the coalition. In Mexican politics, there is a lack of a clear platform of ideas and causes in the opposition. Ideally, a politician should find a balance between loyalty to principles, coherence between thought and actions, and congruence with oneself.
In conclusion, in politics, it is crucial to maintain coherence between ideas, actions, and parts of a system, as well as to balance loyalty, coherence, and congruence. Confusions in these concepts often arise, leading to distortions in political practice. It is essential for politicians to find a balance between these elements to perform their function ethically and effectively.
